Vista registry

Desktop Enhancements. Networking Software. Trending from CNET. Download Now. Developer's Description By Digeus. Full Specifications.

What's new in version 4. Release November 7, Date Added October 15, Version 4. Operating Systems. Total Downloads 1, Downloads Last Week 0. Report Software. Related Software. Move, resize, copy, explore, and recover hard disk drive partitions. HWMonitor Free. Here are my Vista Dev questions: 1. Thanks, Steve.

The reason this worked for you in XP is probably because you never tested as standard user and all your users were Administrators. If your installer doesn't have built-in capabilities to help you there, you can still write some custom code to deal with the issue - just be sure to run it as part of your installation, as if you are installing to Program Files that is the one time you can be fairly certain you will be running with full administrative access.

Likewise, the reason this worked for you in XP is because you didn't adequately test as standard user. If you make these suggested changes, and don't run into other problems it is quite possible your application will begin working as a standard user on XP, as well. Sunday, April 13, AM.

Sunday, April 13, PM. Oh, I thought of one other question: I have network users accessing this vista server. Fooling around with Visual Studio for a few minutes, I think it might not be capable. To accomplish this, you could manually edit the MSI that is produced using a tool called ORCA, or you could write a custom action for doing it, or you could use a tool called Votive to build a WiX installer from inside Visual Studio, or, you could build a different type of setup.

A well-behaving custom action is a lot of work. If you decide to go that route, this code sample is a good place to start, as far as understanding what you would need to do to play with permissions.

The code sample doesn't do what you need to do, though, and it isn't a custom action. As far as what 'appropriate' means, I am guessing you probably want to grant 'Users: Full', but you will need to evaluate whether or not that is appropriate for you.

If you open regedit, right click on properties for your registry key, and go to permissions, you will see something similar, there. The article I linked describes the behavior, but virtualization occurs when an application which does not declare a requestedExecutionLevel in its manifest fails to an attempt to write. If you're installing, you won't fail the write to HKLM, so it won't be virtualized.

If you set the correct ACL for your needs at that time, during the installation, no further attempts to write there are going to fail or be virtualized. Virtualization is an undesirable thing. There aren't as far as I know API's built around accessing virtualized files.

And, even if there were, each account would see their own virtualized view, and that wouldn't do what you want. First run is the wrong time to do per-machien initialization for your app.

There is an article here which covers the basics of the Visual Studio setup project, including the registry, which might be a good place to start. My application needs to update some values in registry at run time after getting installed and during subscriber verification process. For this when user clicks on desktop to launch application, that app. I have manifested both these apps with "asInvoker" to let it accessed by standard user.

On XP, all these not giving any problem. Ask a question. Quick access. Search related threads. Remove From My Forums.

Asked by:. Archived Forums. General Windows Desktop Development Issues. Sign in to vote. Saturday, April 12, PM. Thank you for moving me to the right location Here are my Vista Dev questions: 1. Thanks, Steve. The reason this worked for you in XP is probably because you never tested as standard user and all your users were Administrators. If your installer doesn't have built-in capabilities to help you there, you can still write some custom code to deal with the issue - just be sure to run it as part of your installation, as if you are installing to Program Files that is the one time you can be fairly certain you will be running with full administrative access.

Likewise, the reason this worked for you in XP is because you didn't adequately test as standard user. If you make these suggested changes, and don't run into other problems it is quite possible your application will begin working as a standard user on XP, as well. Sunday, April 13, AM. Sunday, April 13, PM.